Morality as self-respect, the categorical imperative

  • 217 Pages
  • 2.67 MB
  • English
Statementby James Scheuermann.
LC ClassificationsMicrofilm 82/964 (B)
The Physical Object
Paginationiv, 217 leaves.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL3128688M
LC Control Number82241447

A superbly readable commentary on Kant's 'Groundwork,' also drawing on Kant's other works to provide a thorough analysis of the famous Categorical Imperative.

The more usual introduction to the 'Groundwork' is the much shorter book that contains Paton's much-praised translation, along with his very useful summary analysis of Kant's by: THE APPROACH TO THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE 1 THE CRITICAL METHOD 1 The need for understanding Kants method.

The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy Herbert James Paton Snippet view - H. Paton was the author of several books, including Kant's Metaphysic of Experience and The Good Will.

Bibliographic 5/5(1). W e are now ready to examine Kant's doctrine in his famous little book with the off-putting title of Foundations [or Groundwork] of the Metaphysics of the preface to that book, he wrote that he intended mainly to set out the ultimate moral norm and defend its ability to obligate us ().

We have already seen that law in the form of the Universal Principle of Justice, but in the. This imperative is categorical. It concerns not the matter of the action, or its intended result, but its form and the principle of which it is itself a result; and what is essentially good in it consists in the mental disposition, let the consequence be what it may.

This imperative may be called that of morality.

Details Morality as self-respect, the categorical imperative EPUB

The Categorical Imperative: a study in Kant's moral philosophy | H J PATON | download | B–OK. Download books for free. Find books.

Kant, Schopenhauer and Morality: Recovering the Categorical Imperative | Mark Thomas Walker (auth.) | download | Z-Library. Download books for free. Find books. The traditional view of the categorical imperative as offering a precise standard or criterion against which the moral value of proposed actions might be tested is unrewarding, for the strain in Kant’s thought which is emphasized by these writers and taken as representative of his basic position leads to a number of bizarre conclusions which, perforce, have been universally rejected by.

Kant holds that if there is a fundamental law of morality, it is a Categorical Imperative. Taking the fundamental principle of morality to be a Categorical Imperative implies that moral reasons override other sorts of reasons.

You might, for instance, think you have a self-interested. THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE; An unconditional command which tells us our duty by pointing to actions which are good in themselves.

Essentially this helps us to know what actions are our duty and which are forbidden Kant argued that morality was prescriptive. Moral statements are categorical in that they prescribe actions regardless of the result. the categorical imperative for Kant demands that you must follow absolute rules.

true. nonconsequentialist theories of morality are based on a range of factors including the ends of our actions. false. divine command theory is the view that self-interest, consequences, and motives are lower forms of ethical decision-making and therefore.

The Categorical Imperative. So how is Kant going to try to defend the claim that we have strict, unconditional duties to each other. Earlier we considered the basic distinction between conditional and unconditional claims.

Conditional claims are claims about what is right or true that may or may not hold. Categorical imperative, in the ethics of the 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, founder of critical philosophy, a rule of conduct that is unconditional or absolute for all agents, the validity or claim of which does not depend on any desire or end.

The Categorical Imperative book.

Description Morality as self-respect, the categorical imperative FB2

Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. A classic exposition of Kant's ethical thought. The Categorical Imperative book. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. Start by marking “The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy” as Want to Read/5(1).

Kant’s moral theory has three formulas for the categorical imperative. So, if you’re facing a moral dilemma you must determine whether or not your action is permissible according to the formulas. Simply put, think of the formulas as tests that have to be passed in order for a principle or act to be moral.

This is the first of three chapters dealing with Kant’s attempt to provide a deduction (justification) of the categorical imperative. It suggests that this deduction occurs in stages, involving the deductions of both the moral law, which describes the volition of a perfectly rational or holy will, and the presupposition of.

The most basic formulation of the categorical imperative is Kant’s principle of universal law—which states that only a maxim that can be consistently universalized can qualify as a moral law. Whereas the golden rule also employs a requirement of universalizability, Kant’s approach is different in that his formula does not appeal to what.

The concept of imperative categorical was introduced by the German philosopher () in his book Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, in which he explains the concepts and principles of his moral theory. The Kantian ethic is included within the ethics of duty that deny that you can justify an action by the consequences.

Lying is a contradiction of the categorical imperative: it cannot be universalized as it would render the very act of communicating, wanting to be understood and believed, meaningless.

Lying is a contradiction of the practical imperative: it is inconsistent with. In notes written in –5, Kant introduced his characterization of the fundamental principle of morality as the “categorical imperative” and the position that this fundamental principle expresses the intrinsic and absolute value of freedom.

In these notes he experimented with psychological arguments for this position, that is, with grounding the moral principle in the purported. The categorical imperative does not arise from the respect for the dignity of the individual agent, but from a necessity and a moral obligation.

On the one hand, if Kant thought. Kant Categorical imperatives helps answer this question because it helps determine morality depending on the choice that is made and how it will affect others, it allows people to look at the situation if it applied to everybody and what affect it will have.

Kant Categorical Imperative is the way to go when. How Kant Should Have Justified His Categorical Imperative. Front Matter. Pages PDF. From Rational Agency to Freedom. Mark Thomas Walker.

Pages From Freedom to the Non-Phenomenal why should we be moral. this book argues that we can only give a truly and morally satisfying answer to that question by radically reconfiguring.

The categorical imperative (German: kategorischer Imperativ) is the central philosophical concept in the deontological moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Introduced in Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, it may be defined as a way of evaluating motivations for action.

Kant’s moral theory uses the categorical imperative as its basis. The categorical imperative states “act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”.

(Kant, pg. 30) A maxim is a reason a person commits and act. (Kant, pg. 30) Kant does not believe a person show more content. According to Kant, our moral duties (as given by the categorical imperative): Can only be determined from a consideration of what is seen to be rational from the viewpoint of a particular culture or society.

Can only be determined from a consideration of the “historical struggle” of a culture or society. I have called this lecture “Kant’s Imperative” so that I might begin by pointing up an ever-intriguing circumstance. Kant claims that the Categorical Imperative, which is the Moral Law, is implicitly known to every fully formed human yet its formulation is absolutely original with him.

Kant purposes to lay bare the fundamental principle of morality and show that it applies to us. Central to the work is the role of what Kant refers to as the categorical imperative, the concept that one must act only according to that precept which he or she would will to become a universal law.

The basic idea behind Kant's categorical imperative is that our moral duties are: Binding on all rational persons, but only when and if our moral duties are seen as promoting the overall happiness in the world.

Binding only on those persons who are expected to live flourishing or "eudaimonic" lives on the whole. Published inImmanuel Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals ranks alongside Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics as one of the most profound and influential works in moral philosophy ever written.

In Kant's own words, its aim is to identify and corroborate the supreme principle of morality, the categorical imperative.

It makes morality depend on a person's desires. It makes morality depend solely on the consequences of one's actions.

Download Morality as self-respect, the categorical imperative PDF

It fails to give us any guidance whatsoever. It allows lying, which is never permissible. Author: Roger J. Sullivan Publisher: Cambridge University Press ISBN: Size: MB Format: PDF, Mobi Category: Philosophy Languages: en Pages: View: Book Description: This is the most up-to-date, brief and accessible introduction to Kant's ethics approaches the moral theory via the political philosophy, thus allowing the reader to appreciate why Kant.The discourse in the business world has gone beyond the primary purpose of business.

While some scholars would argue that the primary purpose of business is profit maximization, others are of the opinion that business, beyond maximizing profit, exists to promote and enhance the well-being of humanity.

Between these two divides, this paper attempts to contribute robustly to this perennial.2 days ago  Think of characters in movies, TV shows, or books, people in the news, historical figures, etc. Please don’t use an example that someone else has already used!

1. Engage with the text: Once you have thought of your example, evaluate what they did according to Kant’s Categorical Imperative. First, explain the Categorical Imperative.